Duration: 561 seconds Upload Time: 07-05-20 03:30:03 User: azrienoch :::: Favorites |
|
Description:
I think there's something for everyone in this. Here's the link to the pdf article on presuppositionalism: http://grove.ufl.edu/~aasa/witmer%20talk%201.pdf EDIT: I'm including another link on The New Rhetoric and Chaim Perelman. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaim_Perelman |
|
Comments | |
insanemusic7 ::: Favorites can you rephrase that 07-05-28 01:37:16 _____________________________________________________ | |
insanemusic7 ::: Favorites i don't want to misinterpret 07-05-28 01:51:34 _____________________________________________________ | |
azrienoch ::: Favorites Logic is about structure, not truth. Something can be completely logical and be completely wrong at the same time. 07-05-28 02:52:34 _____________________________________________________ | |
Naphra ::: Favorites PM'd you. 07-05-28 19:09:12 _____________________________________________________ | |
azrienoch ::: Favorites I pmed back. 07-05-28 21:46:40 _____________________________________________________ | |
Akyrumunios ::: Favorites Here is the deal. When it comes to faith.(in my beleaf) <- kinda messes up my credabilty. No one is false. Everyone is True because it is beleaf. We my contradic each other but no one is wrong. And no one is right with God "almighty" you will never understand it because if it is tangable by thought then it is not "alighty". 07-06-18 17:27:54 _____________________________________________________ | |
chucklesdeeclown ::: Favorites Everything is true, and everthing is false. It all depends on who is looking at the situation, and what belief structure has defined those views. As a buddhist, I see truth everywhere whereas I also see them as false. 07-06-18 17:43:52 _____________________________________________________ | |
enash64 ::: Favorites Truth is not at the root of the argument between Atheism and theism. It has more to do with belonging. Being and feeling alone or not. Those who are comfortable with different degrees of being, stick together in the feelings and cages built for them. Truth is contentment and can never be known unless we transcend time and space. 07-06-18 18:40:59 _____________________________________________________ | |
AtSwimTwoBricks ::: Favorites Fascinating video. I loved it. But even if we find ourselves with incommensurable content, aren't there other differences to be considered? In science and common sense we usually stick to the minimum consistent explanation. Mathematicians have good reason to keep their axiom set small. Instead of arguing "believe x," might we settle each moment by saying "use the principles of axiom choice you're familiar with elsewhere, but now in this field"? 07-07-16 13:14:20 _____________________________________________________ | |
tammarasoccergirlv ::: Favorites Find a hot date at >>>> FLINGDATINGSITE dot COM <<<< 07-08-11 05:53:15 _____________________________________________________ |
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Argumentation: The Language of Truth
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment